Start with the decision the reader needs
An investigation should explain whether the evidence supports a legitimate operation and what can prevent access to a balance. Technical identifiers belong in the supporting record unless they resolve a practical question. A long source list is not a substitute for an answer.
Give unresolved money proper attention
We distinguish what the player reports, what the operator says, what the public evidence establishes and what remains unknown. A rejected document does not justify assuming customer wrongdoing. A closed complaint does not establish payment, and a small refund should not erase a larger unresolved claim.
Where a case cannot be independently settled, we attribute the allegation and describe the available response. The reader needs a usable next step, not an assurance that a restriction must be reasonable or a promise that the money will be recovered.
Review the page as an individual article
- Check whether the short answer and conclusion agree with the evidence and score.
- Remove paragraphs that repeat the same inference, even when the wording differs.
- Compare neighbouring articles for copied arguments or visuals that merely swap a casino name.
- Check that tables, captions and headings help answer the page’s actual questions.
- Inspect mobile layout, links, source dates and the arithmetic behind the published score.
Keep commercial claims verifiable
Partner alternatives are selected for commercial placement. A stated benefit still needs a supporting source, and an offer’s conditions must not be replaced by an invented advantage. We do not infer fewer account blocks from the absence of public complaints or claim a funded test was performed when the work was documentary research.
Details of those links are on the existing commercial-links page.
Correct the affected claim and its shared data
When an operator, score or material rule changes, the corresponding directory, checker and topic records need reconciliation. The correction log records material changes. Full scoring weights and evidence grades are maintained in the methodology rather than repeated here.